Selecting the Research Method - Redigeerimiste ajalugu

Juhan: Lisatud ACM SIGPLAN Empirical Evaluation Guidelines viide.

2024-10-10T15:09:52Z

Lisatud ACM SIGPLAN Empirical Evaluation Guidelines viide.

Juhan: Juhan teisaldas lehekülje Research Method pealkirja Selecting the Research Method alla

2018-03-07T15:49:55Z

Juhan teisaldas lehekülje Research Method pealkirja Selecting the Research Method alla

Juhan: /* Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples */

2018-02-27T12:20:20Z

Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples

Juhan – 27. veebruar 2018, kell 11:03

2018-02-27T11:03:35Z

Juhan – 27. veebruar 2018, kell 11:00

2018-02-27T11:00:17Z

Juhan – 27. veebruar 2018, kell 08:06

2018-02-27T08:06:14Z

Juhan: /* R3: repeatability, reproducibility and rigor */

2018-02-26T10:40:45Z

R3: repeatability, reproducibility and rigor

Juhan – 26. veebruar 2018, kell 10:40

2018-02-26T10:40:19Z

Juhan: /* Scientific Evaluation */

2018-02-26T10:22:06Z

Scientific Evaluation

Juhan: /* A design science research methodology and its application to accounting information systems research */

2018-02-26T10:20:35Z

A design science research methodology and its application to accounting information systems research

←Vanem redaktsioon		Redaktsioon: 10. oktoober 2024, kell 15:09
21. rida:		21. rida:

	"Selecting a research method for empirical software engineering research is problematic because the benefits and challenges to using each method are not yet well catalogued. Therefore, this chapter describes a number of empirical methods available. It examines the goals of each and analyzes the types of questions each best addresses. Theoretical stances behind the methods, practical considerations in the application of the methods and data collection are also briefly reviewed. Taken together, this information provides a suitable basis for both understanding and selecting from the variety of methods applicable to empirical software engineering."		"Selecting a research method for empirical software engineering research is problematic because the benefits and challenges to using each method are not yet well catalogued. Therefore, this chapter describes a number of empirical methods available. It examines the goals of each and analyzes the types of questions each best addresses. Theoretical stances behind the methods, practical considerations in the application of the methods and data collection are also briefly reviewed. Taken together, this information provides a suitable basis for both understanding and selecting from the variety of methods applicable to empirical software engineering."
		+
		+	==[https://www.sigplan.org/Resources/EmpiricalEvaluation/ ACM SIGPLAN Empirical Evaluation Guidelines]==
		+
		+
		+
		+	The programming languages research community often develops ideas whose worth is evaluated empirically. Compiler optimizations, static and dynamic analyses, program synthesizers, testing tools, memory management algorithms, new language features, and other research developments each depend on some empirical evidence to demonstrate their effectiveness. This reality raises some important questions. What kind of empirical evidence yields the most reliable conclusions? What are the best practices for putting together an empirical evaluation in PL research? Do PL research papers published in top venues always follow these best practices?
		+
		+	To answer these questions, in August of 2017 the SIGPLAN Executive Committee formed the ad hoc committee on Programming Language Research Empirical Evaluations. The committee is chaired by Steve Blackburn, and its members include Matthias Hauswirth, Emery Berger, and Michael Hicks. Shriram Krishnamurthi has acted as an external collaborator. The committee brings together expertise on empirical evaluation methodology, experience in running workshops and publishing papers on that topic, experience introducing artifact evaluation into SIGPLAN conferences, and experience chairing the PCs of major SIGPLAN conferences.

	==Statistical Methods==		==Statistical Methods==

←Vanem redaktsioon		Redaktsioon: 27. veebruar 2018, kell 12:20
41. rida:		41. rida:

	"Based on their own experiences of in-depth case studies of software projects in international corporations, in this book the authors present detailed practical guidelines on the preparation, conduct, design and reporting of case studies of software engineering. This is the first software engineering specific book on the case study research method."		"Based on their own experiences of in-depth case studies of software projects in international corporations, in this book the authors present detailed practical guidelines on the preparation, conduct, design and reporting of case studies of software engineering. This is the first software engineering specific book on the case study research method."
		+
		+	The book is accessible via Ebook Central. Please go to [https://tutl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/search?vid=372TUTL_VU1&sortby=rank&lang=en_US e-resource portal Primo]. Then enter the title in quotation marks. There will be 2 responses both linking to the EbookCentral database. From outside the university network please follow the instructions at [https://wiki.ttu.ee/it/en/doc/lib_toru the web page of the IT Department].
		+
		+	Raamat on TTÜ tudengitele ja töötajatele kättesaadav andmebaasi Ebook Central kaudu. Kõige kiiremini jõuab raamatuni raamatukogu esilehel Infoallikad loetelus [https://tutl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/search?vid=372TUTL_VU1&sortby=rank&lang=en_US e-ressursside portaali Primo] kasutades. Kui sisestada raamatu pealkiri jutumärkides, siis saame kaks vastust, mis mõlemad viivad EbookCentral andmebaasi. Väljaspool ülikooli võrku saavad üliõpilased juurdepääsu ülikooli Uni-ID-ga
		+	toimides vastavalt [https://wiki.ttu.ee/it/et/doc/lib_toru#juurdepaeaes_raamatukogu_andmebaasidele IT Helpdeski juhendile].

	==[https://books.google.ee/books?id=iaQ5DwAAQBAJ Research Methods in Education]==		==[https://books.google.ee/books?id=iaQ5DwAAQBAJ Research Methods in Education]==

@@ 35. rida: / 35. rida: @@
 propose solutions that could both increase the productivity
 of researchers and the quality of their output."
 ==[https://books.google.ee/books?id=iaQ5DwAAQBAJ Research Methods in Education]==
@@ 41. rida: / 47. rida: @@
 If your thesis touches on improving or analysis of the way education is provided, please consult the book linked above. Please note that for IT students the thesis should involve a substantial amount of software development or data analysis, but you should be aware of the methods used for education research and be able to fit your results into the wider context.

←Vanem redaktsioon		Redaktsioon: 27. veebruar 2018, kell 11:00
41. rida:		41. rida:

	If your thesis touches on improving or analysis of the way education is provided, please consult the book linked above. Please note that for IT students the thesis should involve a substantial amount of software development or data analysis, but you should be aware of the methods used for education research and be able to fit your results into the wider context.		If your thesis touches on improving or analysis of the way education is provided, please consult the book linked above. Please note that for IT students the thesis should involve a substantial amount of software development or data analysis, but you should be aware of the methods used for education research and be able to fit your results into the wider context.
		+
		+	==[https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118181034 Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples]==
		+
		+	by Per Runeson, Martin Höst, Austen Rainer and Björn Regnell.
		+
		+	"Based on their own experiences of in-depth case studies of software projects in international corporations, in this book the authors present detailed practical guidelines on the preparation, conduct, design and reporting of case studies of software engineering. This is the first software engineering specific book on the case study research method."

←Vanem redaktsioon		Redaktsioon: 27. veebruar 2018, kell 08:06
1. rida:		1. rida:
−	As a student, it is important to choose an appropriate research method that suits solving the problem at hand. Please look at the links below (most are accessible from within the university network) and discuss with your supervisor which is the best approach. Note that you do not need to write lengthy chapters about the method, it is just necessary to clearly state what the method you use is and how your approach is adjusted to the appropriate method.	+	As a student, it is important to choose an appropriate research method that suits solving the problem at hand. Please look at the links below (most are accessible from within the university network) and discuss with your supervisor which is the best approach. Note that you do not need to write lengthy chapters about the method, it is just necessary to clearly state what the method you use is and how your approach is adjusted to the appropriate method. Please also note that the structure of a thesis is very similar to that of a research paper.

	==[https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2009.17 How to Write and Read a Scientific Evaluation Paper]==		==[https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2009.17 How to Write and Read a Scientific Evaluation Paper]==

←Vanem redaktsioon	Redaktsioon: 7. märts 2018, kell 15:49
(Erinevus puudub)

@@ 30. rida: / 30. rida: @@
 by Jan Vitek and Tomas Kalibera.
-"Computer  systems  research  spans  sub-disciplines  that  in-
+"Computer  systems  research  spans  subdisciplines  that  include embedded systems, programming languages and compilers,  networking,  and  operating  systems.  Our  contention
 is that a number of structural factors inhibit quality systems
 research. We highlight some of the factors we have encountered in our own work and observed in published papers and

@@ 1. rida: / 1. rida: @@
 As a student, it is important to choose an appropriate research method that suits solving the problem at hand. Please look at the links below (most are accessible from within the university network) and discuss with your supervisor which is the best approach. Note that you do not need to write lengthy chapters about the method, it is just necessary to clearly state what the method you use is and how your approach is adjusted to the appropriate method.
-==[https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2009.17 Scientific Evaluation]==
+==[https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2009.17 How to Write and Read a Scientific Evaluation Paper]==
 by Roel Wieringa, Hans Heerkens and Björn Regnell.

@@ 14. rida: / 14. rida: @@
 The above paper gives a nice overview of how design science research method is applied to concrete information systems. This may be easier to read than the classic references
- [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8_2 Design Science Research in Information Systems] by A. Hevner and S. Chatterjee, and [https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302 A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research] by Ken Peffers, Tuure Tuunanen, Marcus A. Rothenberger and Samir Chatterjee.
+[https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8_2 Design Science Research in Information Systems] by A. Hevner and S. Chatterjee, and [https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302 A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research] by Ken Peffers, Tuure Tuunanen, Marcus A. Rothenberger and Samir Chatterjee.
 ==[https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-044-5_11 Selecting Empirical Methods for Software Engineering Research]==